![\"Rocky](\"https:\/\/ncseagrant.ncsu.edu\/coastwatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/13\/2014\/02\/Rocky-Branch-1.jpg\")
“Rocky Branch is expected to become a national model for urban stream revitalization,” says Ronald G. Hodson, director of North Carolina Sea Grant. “This is consistent with the mission of both Sea Grant and a land grant university \u2014 leading the way for the nation in addressing major issues.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The restoration plan employs “natural channel design” to allow the stream to meander through a newly created floodplain. Native vegetation allows views of the creek while providing habitat, cover and food for wildlife. Natural materials, such as rootwads, willow branches and logs, were chosen for streambank stabilization rather than riprap or other man-made materials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
To get the job done, Doll is collaborating with dozens of people from the university’s Facilities Planning and Design Division, Office of the University Architect, College of Design and N.C. Stream Restoration Institute<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No one is ready to rest on the laurels of a well-done Phase I. Phase II, set to begin next spring, will improve an additional 1,500 feet of the stream and environs. Phase III will restore another 1,600-foot stretch in 2004.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
With each leg of restored stream goes a new leg of greenway to provide alternative transportation, recreational opportunities and greater access to the stream itself. At certain sites, the paths and stream will duck under busy street intersections for safer walking, biking or jogging within the campus. Ultimately, the Rocky Branch Greenway will join Raleigh’s greenway system, which connects streams and parks throughout the city.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Later, interpretive signs will be installed to explain concepts of natural channel design and identify flora and fauna along the stream and greenway. College of Design students developed the Rocky Branch logo for the signs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
NC State design students have been part of the process from early on. In 1999, students in a landscape architecture design studio built a 30-foot model to illustrate the Rocky Branch stream\/greenway design vision to prospective funding agencies. It also served as a conceptual model for the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Challenging hurdles<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Doll, along with facilities project manager Jill Coleman, university landscape architect Sallie Ricks and construction manager Ted Devens seemed undaunted by the tremendous hurdles the project often presented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It was important to minimize campus disruption and to maximize the funding resources. Once, Doll and Coleman spotted a rock spoil pile left over from a major construction project. It was exactly the kind of material needed for Rocky Branch. They struck a deal with the developer \u2014 and tons of rocks were theirs for the hauling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The rocks would be used for a complex piece of engineering in the first phase \u2014 reworking the 16 culverts responsible for dumping storm water into Rocky Branch from a nearby urban thoroughfare and impervious surfaces throughout the watershed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In any storm event, the force of the water would scour the streambed, destabilize the banks, and push huge amounts of sediment downstream. Over time, the eroded stream banks could not provide support for concrete culverts, which collapsed and fell into the stream bed. Hurricane Fran, in 1996, further eroded Rocky Branch, leaving behind more collapsed stormwater pipes, felled trees and exposed tree roots.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In spite of the cumulative harsh blows, there were signs that Rocky Branch was trying to repair itself. “It was fighting back, trying to meander; trying to re-establish its floodplain with vegetation, riffles and pools. Without help, it might have taken 20 to 25 years to heal itself. But in the meantime, huge volumes of sediment would have been dumped downstream,” Doll says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Phase I included replacing the storm water pipes. Also, new rock vanes would take the pressure off stream banks during storm events and reduce stream bank erosion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Other engineering hurdles included relocating a 1,100-foot sewer line, and redesigning road crossings while maintaining steam, utilities and telecommunication services for university buildings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Stormwater controls \u2014 such as bioretention areas and a constructed wetland \u2014 were constructed to filter and detain stormwater runoff from campus roads and parking lots. In addition, two rain gardens along a 2,800-foot segment of greenway divert stormwater runoff from the adjacent busy road \u2014 removing nutrients, sediment, bacteria and oil before draining into Rocky Branch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Education is an important aspect of the Rocky Branch restoration project, Doll points out. “Other than a few students and faculty, many on campus are not aware of the existence of Rocky Branch. Others refer to it as a “ditch.” Long before we broke ground for the restoration, we began a campaign to encourage the use of Rocky Branch as an educational asset,” she says. Student volunteers stenciled “Keep Clean” messages on more than 80 drains throughout the campus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Through the leadership of Sam Mozley, professor of zoology, students in his laboratory class and the Lorax Environmental Club have monitored the aquatic inhabitants in the stream for nearly a decade. And, Tom Drake, professor of marine earth and atmospheric science, uses Rocky Branch for his geomorphology class exercises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Doll frequently leads field walks for students in zoology, botany and wildlife studies. In addition, Rocky Branch is a demonstration site for the university’s N.C. Stream Restoration Institute, an outreach program to professionals in public works, resource management and private consulting positions from across the state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Andrew Burg, who heads up the Mecklenburg County Stormwater Services Department, is among the “students” who have witnessed the transformation of this outdoor laboratory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Like Doll, Burg is involved in the formidable task of breathing new life into abused inland streams. He expects the nearly completed Little Sugar Creek Restoration and Greenway Project in Charlotte’s Freedom Park to have a cumulative positive impact on the Catawba River, which flows across the South Carolina border en route to coastal waters. The project addresses stream and wetland restoration and stormwater management issues and is funded in-part by the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program. It is the first in a series of projects in the Little Sugar watershed, including one funded by the CWMTF and one funded by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And, like Rocky Branch in Raleigh, Little Sugar Creek provides a “teachable moment” to convey the benefits of basinwide water quality management to public and elected officials in the greater Charlotte area.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “The important revelation about basinwide management is that we all are using the same water. Whatever sediment we put in upstream, whatever wastewater we put in upstream, whatever runoff we put in upstream all becomes someone else’s water downstream,” Burg says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “If we can nip the problem at the source, we can prevent problems downstream. My job is to identify and fix past mistakes,” he says. “It’s also to try to educate the public and elected officials about protecting water quality. If we continue to just fix mistakes, we’ll never get ahead of the water quality issue.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Enlightened citizens and officials must be involved in self-regulation, he says. For example, policies recently adopted by Mecklenburg County, Charlotte and many surrounding municipalities prohibit building in flood plains, require stream buffers from 25 to 100 feet, and require that developers leave at least 10 percent tree cover on building sites.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Prevention, Doll and Burg know, is much more cost-effective than finding ways and means to undo mistakes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Meanwhile, Doll and Burg both continue to spread the water quality gospel and to plug away at breathing new life into failing urban streams.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “It’s exciting to see the Rocky Branch recovery process beginning to take place,” Doll says. “It may take some time to get back its full aesthetic value, but there will be no more banks falling in, no more sediment being carried away. Most importantly, the restoration of Rocky Branch is beginning to make a substantial difference to Walnut Creek and ultimately, the Neuse.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n EarthTech of Raleigh developed the working design plan for Phase I, and Tri State Consultants of Greensboro was selected as the contractor. Bids will be let for the next phase in 2003.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n This article was published in the Autumn 2002<\/a> issue of Coastwatch.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"Rocky](\"https:\/\/ncseagrant.ncsu.edu\/coastwatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/13\/2014\/02\/Rocky-Branch-2.jpg\")
Teachable moments<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
![\"Rocky](\"https:\/\/ncseagrant.ncsu.edu\/coastwatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/13\/2014\/02\/Rocky-Branch-restored-stream.jpg\")