<\/a>Saltmarsh moves into the upland forest as sea level rises when development does not impede the upland boundary.<\/p><\/div>\n
This model (left) explains what happens when the slope between the saltmarsh and upland is gradual or \u201cramped\u201d, but what happens when the boundary is a scarp \u2014 steeper and more abrupt?<\/p>\n
Over the past year, our lab has been sampling sites across ramp and scarped upland gradients in North Carolina. The ultimate goal is to better understand how sea level influences saltmarsh transgression.<\/p>\n
So far, we\u2019ve taken 31 sediment cores at 4 different sites: scarps at Shallotte and Newport and ramps at Cedar Island and Hobucken. After we took core transects \u2014 a series of cores perpendicular to the marsh shoreline \u2014 we brought the cores back to the lab, cut them in half, and examined them (top photo).<\/p>\n
At the gradual ramp sites, we found sediment in the cores that was indicative of transgression due to sea level rise. Although we expected to find this, we\u2019re still working to understand the nuanced relationship between transgression and sea level rise.<\/p>\n
We weren\u2019t expecting to find \u201cregressive\u201d (seaward moving) marsh that fronted the steep scarped boundaries \u2014 but cores at both scarp sites showed regression.<\/p>\n
We radiocarbon dated our marshes as \u201cmodern\u201d, meaning they formed after 1950. We then focused on the Newport site and determined a massive increase in marsh area between 1964 and 1975. In the watershed, a project to grow and cultivate trees had begun in 1964, which increased suspended sediment in the estuary and promoted marsh growth. After 1975, marsh growth slowed and remained relatively stable.<\/p>\n
So what does this all mean for saltmarsh management? Should these marshes be protected or left to erode, returning the coast to a natural state? Without the additional sediment from human activity, after all, these marshes wouldn\u2019t normally have formed as they did.<\/p>\n
With limited resources, managers need to identify the ecosystem benefits most important for an area when considering which saltmarsh should receive protection from wave erosion. Managing older marshes \u2014 which have been providing ecosystem services for thousands of years and contain rich carbon stocks \u2014 might be a better use of resources. On the other hand, new marshes offer other ecosystem services, such as fishing sites, but will most likely require erosion-control structures to succeed.<\/p>\n
In any case, because it\u2019s nearly impossible to know the age of a saltmarsh from its surface, cores that sample the entire marsh thickness are important when deciding how best to conserve these fragile habitats.<\/p>\n
Read more about North Carolina Sea Grant’s Core Proj<\/em>ects<\/a>.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Marshes face both natural and human stressors on seaward and landward edges.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":63,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[690,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11615","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-currents","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Migrating Marshes Reveal Sea Level Rise and Human Activity - Coastwatch Currents<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n