Water sample locations include sites from the upper, middle and lower regions of the Neuse River Estuary. Map courtesy Alexey Katin.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nTo develop the model, Obenour, Paerl and their team identified biophysical interactions, including the amount of water flowing out of the river into the estuary in different seasons, and the quantity of nutrients that water carries.<\/p>\n
The model generates daily predictions of dissolved oxygen in the estuary\u2019s bottom waters, the lowest three feet. While hypoxia can occur from spring through fall, July and August tend to be the most severe months for hypoxia and fish kills. Thus, predictions of July to August 2018 dissolved oxygen were aggregated to create this forecast.<\/p>\n
\u201cWater in the estuary resolves itself into two layers, lighter surface water and denser bottom water \u2013 like Italian dressing in a bottle separates into lighter and heavier layers,\u201d Obenour explains.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe surface layer of water contains more oxygen because oxygen-producing algae reside there and it is exposed to the air. The bottom water contains less oxygen because of a few factors. One being no exposure to the air, another being oxygen-consuming microbes,\u201d he adds. \u201cLike the spices at the bottom of the salad dressing bottle, algae and related organic material settle into the bottom water where the microbes feed on it and reduce the water\u2019s oxygen content.\u201d<\/p>\n
For their measurements, Obenour and Paerl reviewed data from eight monitoring locations, which overall reflected the upper, middle and lower sections of the estuary.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe model predicts that average bottom-water dissolved oxygen levels will drop below 2\u00a0mg\/L \u2014 a critical threshold for many aquatic species, indicating a greater likelihood of fish kills,\u201d explains Alexey Katin, an NC State engineering graduate student working with Obenour.<\/p>\n
The team pinpointed two main reasons for low bottom-water dissolved oxygen \u2014 both related to the rate of water flow into the estuary from upstream, as measured by the U.S. Geological Survey.<\/p>\n
First, the new model\u2019s results suggest that a lower river-water flow rate in winter and early spring allows organic matter to build up in the estuary, instead of flushing out as usual. \u201cThink of it as a tub with a clogged drain,\u201d Fear suggests.<\/p>\nObserved (teal) and forecasted (red) average July-August bottom-water dissolved oxygen (BWDO) for upper, middle and lower segments of the Neuse River estuary. The red bar represents the 90% confidence interval for our forecast. It reflects uncertainties in the model, as well as uncertainties in projected July-August flow and weather conditions. Dotted line shows the 2 mg\/L hypoxic threshold. Dissolved oxygen levels below this threshold can be harmful to many aquatic species<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nAverage flow rates from December 2017 to April 2018 were 30 percent lower compared to mean flow rates over the two-decade study period.<\/em><\/p>\nSecond, because of high levels of precipitation in the spring of 2018, late spring and summer river flows are elevated by about 60 percent, compared to the mean over the past two decades. Higher flows typically carry higher nutrient loads through the estuary, which fuel algal production.<\/p>\n
Using the tub example again, this can be like unclogging the drain, thus letting all the previously blocked water and nutrients flow into the estuary.<\/p>\n
Obenour and Paerl anticipate another year of testing before their hypoxia forecasting model will be finalized. They stress that it is still experimental, even as it predicts a higher likelihood of severe hypoxia in the Neuse for July and August.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe experimental forecast developed earlier this year is already beginning to be confirmed in the trend for conditions observed so far in July,\u201d Paerl notes. \u201cThe long-term value of the model is that it will help us predict the extent of hypoxia in future years, which will depend on varying winter and spring rains that drive nutrient-laden runoff entering the estuary.\u201d<\/p>\n
Obenour is eager to share the results with the public and various resource managers. \u201cWe hope to raise people\u2019s awareness and get them thinking about this issue of nutrient loading in the ecosystem,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n
Fear agrees: \u201cManaging nutrients is key to decreasing the hypoxia threat.\u201d<\/p>\n
For background information, read about the team\u2019s <\/em>prior research into water quality issues in the Neuse River Estuary<\/em><\/a>, which serves as a foundation for their experimental model. Another blog post takes a deeper dive into <\/em>modeling and identifying sources of nutrient loading <\/em><\/a>that can lead to algal blooms.<\/em><\/p>\n###<\/p>\n
North Carolina Sea Grant: Your link to research and resources for a healthier coast<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"An experimental model \u2014 developed by a team that includes researchers at North Carolina State University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill \u2014 is forecasting levels of low dissolved oxygen this summer that will be worse than those normally in the Neuse River Estuary.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":58,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ncst_custom_author":"","ncst_show_custom_author":false,"ncst_dynamicHeaderBlockName":"","ncst_dynamicHeaderData":"","ncst_content_audit_freq":"","ncst_content_audit_date":"","ncst_content_audit_display":false,"ncst_backToTopFlag":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1391],"tags":[],"_ncst_magazine_issue":[],"class_list":["post-10243","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research"],"displayCategory":null,"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Model Forecasts Severe Hypoxia through August in Neuse Estuary - North Carolina Sea Grant<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n